Mystery
Book Writing
By
ragavan
The two books I read were Sherlock Holmes and When You
Reach Me. In my opinion, I think Rebecca Stead, the author of When You Reach
Me, created interesting characters because, when Miranda receives the letters,
the author created a good suspense for the reader and she revealed it at the
right time, the end of the book. Then, I also started to wonder if the
character who sends the letters is someone we already know in the story or a
new character that is going to be introduced. And the way she described the
Laughing Man. Just plain incredible. In my opinion, Rebecca Stead created a
better mystery because, she gave a false lead. She made Miranda think it was a
different character. And at the end of p.99, she made a splendid cliffhanger.
Mystery Final Writing by abby
The two
books I read were from The Mixed up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankenweiler by E.L.
Kongingsburg and Wolf Stalker by Gloria Skurziyski and Alane Ferguson. In my
opinion I think that E.L. Kongingsburg did a better job at creating and
describing interesting characters, because in the beginning of The Mixed up
Files, the author indirectly shows you that Claudia, the protagonist, is very
elegant, loves art, and loves to be comfortable. The scene supporting these
character traits is on p.5, were Claudia says “To a large place, to a
comfortable place, an indoor place and preferably a beautiful place.” But in
Wolf Stalker as it clearly states “they are just an average family.”
I also
think that E.L. Kongingsburg did a better job at describing things in the book.
For example (on p.36 and 38), it says, “The bed had a tall canopy supported by
an ornately carved head board at one end and by two gigantic posts at the end.”
For me it is very easy to visualize what the bed looks like, and is very well
described.
Mystery Final by Maddie
The first book I read was Sherlock Holmes
and the Irregulars, by Tracy Mack and Michael Citrin. The second book I read
was The Mixed Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankenwiler, by E.L. Koningsburg.
I think E.L. Koninsburg did a better job
at describing things. For example, in the story it says, “All the walls are
black marble except for one that is mirrored entirely. The faucets are gold,
and the spigot is shaped like dragons head. The tub looks like a black swimming
pool sunken into the floor; there are two steps down to the bottom.”
But I do believe Tracy Mack and Michael
Citrin did a better job at creating interesting characters. For example, the
story says, “Ozzie looked at his friends, grinning happily, his hazel eyes
shining like the coins in the bowler.” They clearly stated his peppy
personality and his appearance.
In my opinion, I really can’t choose which
one is a better novel. The Mixed Up Files is really interesting but, the
mystery is so suddenly solved, and has very little suspense. On the other hand,
Sherlock Holmes has a lot of action and suspense. When it comes to the overall
story I think Sherlock Holmes is the winner.
LONDON EYE BY: BRODY
The
book I read twice was the London Eye by Siobhan Dowd. I thought the description
was amazing! For example, the book said “The sky was blue, the river was gray,
and the London Eye is white. The London Eye a good puzzling, suspenseful, and
unique writing. One false lead was when Ted thought Salim was kidnapped. A
cliffhanger was when the boy on the train was Marcus not Salim. Ted was my
favorite character because he had a couple of theories that he wanted to test
out. He also solved the London Eye mystery. I think that the author put good
qualities. For example, Ted has unique thoughts, good ideas, and is a good
mystery solver. Salim is a young mischievous troublemaker, has a good heart,
and likes his friend.
No comments:
Post a Comment